fbpx Family Feud Questions For Youth Pdf, Split Screen Racing, Feel Invincible Nightcore 1 Hour, Fortnite Reading Comprehension Answers, Doug Lawler Wife, Whirlpool 18mstfa Too Cold, " />


Awale Mag

Magazine for Africa's Creativity

Auteur/Author:

hickok45 gp100 vs 686

Based on how many people love the GP100, I think it's safe to say you couldn't go wrong with either one. I’ve narrowed it down to two options. I'll admit I'm a novice when it comes to double actions and double so for Smiths, Not sure how to delete the thread but I see this question was answered below my apologies. Fwiw my buddy just got a smith 586 (blued version of the 686). I went through the same “dilemma” 6 years ago when looking for my first revolver. “To a brave man, good and bad luck are like his left and right hand. Even though the failures are few, it’s still there. The thing will drive nails if I do my job. I definitely agree with this. What activity do you have planned for shooting it? You must log in or register to reply here. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. I own a 686 and my father owns a GP100, either guns are top in my book. Nice gun. I shot a friend's 686 Plus and it gave me the itch for a revolver (everything else was a 1911 at the time). Any input is appreciated. It's one of my very favorite guns. I have seen handled and fired both of these guns and they are both good guns but i would chose the GP100 because its heavier than the 686 and can absorb the recoil of the magnum loads much better. I used to have a 686 6" and it was a great gun, wish I still had it. The Ruger GP100 and the Smith & Wesson 686. I also have a number of 686's same 4" & 6" variations. Anyone had any experience with one vs the other? This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. That's it, accuracy only. Have a 686 and absolutely love it. Never shot a ruger gp but I have a 686 I bought used with a trigger job already done. The lock can be taken out and there is a plug available to fill the unsightly hole. Think the model # is 1753. Never a problem with it and put a lot of rounds through it. The same goes for the Python, when he is added to the list. K frame is phenomenal. Both companies have fine customer service/warranties. The Smith is perfectly balanced (4 inch no-lock) and it is without a doubt my favorite wheel gun.//. I have a 4” 686-5 and two GP-100s (3” & 6”). That said, Ruger revolvers are tanks and break in wonderfully. I was literally looking at these 2 revolvers today. So, in a six-inch revolver, which gun is generally more accurate? Just sweet. the same design that's been working for 130+ years? Myself I have the 686+, wich is the seven shot version, with the 4" barrel, I got to admit that I love this gun. I’ve shot the GP100, but I have not shot the Smith & Wesson. Ruger® GP100® Match Champion™ Double-Action Revolver Model 1775, Revolverholics: S&W 686 vs. GP100 vs. SP101. Click, click, click. Since then there have been numerous attempts to do the same with GP-100 vs 686. One of the gun magazines back in the 1980's did a pretty thorough side by side comparison between the 686 and Python. If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over. Hickok45 _____ Even though the GP100 looks or appears beefier when comparing the two I always seem to choose the GP 100 first. What are you looking for in the firearm? Come join the discussion about optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more! GP100 shoots great, accurate, robust, easy front sight replacement. get a 66-8 new production. I have a Talo GP100 and I love the damn thing. C9183124-6AB3-4206-A840-CECCBB21C9F5.jpeg, Second Media Corp., 111 Peter Street, Suite 901, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1, Canada. I've always been a big Ruger revolver fan, have several of their single actions, and decided I needed a 4 inch .357 the other day. Really nice gun super smooth and very accurate. But a 686 is head over heels the better more balanced gun. Buy a Standard GP100, and have Tim Gosling at Gartman arms to a trigger job, spring changes and add Trigger Shims and you will get a better product. The answer depends mostly on personal preference, since characteristics and performance are so close. you mean the side plate? When I started to look in earnest for a .357 to buy, I heard the siren song of the GP100 Master Champion and I bought it. Anyone have experience with both of these that could lend an opinion ? The finish on the 686 looked like crap. I cant decide. Planned to teach my wife some trigger staging and it was just so much easier with the S&W. There have been reports of failures, so I wouldn’t want one with the lock. GP100 is a nice revolver, is tough as nails and is more forgiving to reloaders because of its simple tough construction. I'm only concerned with accuracy. The gp100 was also about $100 cheaper. I went with the 617 in 6" bbl as well. By all means, please continue on if you wish. My GP shot just as good as the 686. The Smith is perfectly balanced (4 inch no-lock) and it is without a doubt my favorite wheel gun. FWIW, I bought a 642 with the lock for my son as a carry gun. Just the opposite on my newer GP 100's vs 686. Final conclusions have been mixed on that. I've had both and just like the "feel" of the 686 better. I now have a 3" 686, which I prefer over the Ruger. I’m in the market for a .357 revolver (6 inch barrel). Either are great guns. I have a few Ruger GP100's (all in.357) a couple of 6" & a 4" . I’m in the market for a .357 revolver (6 inch barrel). Now I have a Mod 10, 36 Unfired, neither. From my experiences with a 6" 686-1 vs my new 6" gp100 I couldn't tell a difference with either one. Any input is appreciated. A forum community dedicated to Ruger firearm owners and enthusiasts. I prefer the GP-100 for shooting .357, but the Smith wins all other comparisons. Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. Anyone have experience with both of these that could lend an opinion ? Yes, I know the gp100 vs. 686 has been debated more often than ford v. chevy and "taste great v. less filling". In the previous thread I notice multiple people saying don't get a Smith that has the lock/they never would. Light hammer strikes right out if the box. The question of S&W 686 vs. GP100 is a redundant question indeed. I have a 686+ 6"bbl....LOVE it...very smooth....If you're near Hopkinton, I can let you try mine. Both are good guns and I'm positive that there isn't a wrong choice. JavaScript is disabled. I prefer the Ruger because of the internal lock on the Smith. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages. The we had the 10,000 round tests at FLETC for a total of about 60,000 rounds. I just can't get past that screw down plate on the S&W. The Ruger GP100 and the Smith & Wesson 686. :emoji_metal: FWIW at one time I had about 12 S&Ws from Mod 10,15,19,27,28,29,36 and a couple others I can't remember the Model number of and no Rugers. Used examples of this can be had for about half the cost of the 686 and boy do they shoot. If I were to choose between them the 686 would edge it out simply due to what I feel is a smoother trigger which gives me a more consistent groping. I just can't get past that screw down plate on the S&W. Is there an issue with the lock mechanically or is this just an aesthetic issue for people? The same goes for the Python, when he is added to the list. Great gun, never had a problem with it. JavaScript is disabled. If illegal immigration is allowed then what is the point of having legal immigration? My older 686 has a slightly better fit & finish than my older GP100. I've never shot the GP100. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. The lock on our JFrames don’t seem to be a issue but have had that type of lock cause a a Rossi to lock up the cylinder from being partially engaged. When I was still a member at Danvers a guy named Jaime let me shoot his performance center S&W, wonderful trigger. Shoot it all the time. Very accurate and fun to shoot. The Ruger will usually be a little less expensive, and the Smiths are a little more refined. I’ve decided on the Ruger. Thank you all for the feedback. The answer depends mostly on personal preference, since characteristics and performance are so close. Better feel and trigger, plus, it's a Smith. Ruger GP100 22LR Revolver Range Review Shooting the Ruger GP-100 "Match Champion" 357 Magnum Double-Action Revolver- Gunblast.com Ruger GP100 Match Champion vs. S&W 686 357 Magnum The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex. I do think the Ruger looks better though. The 686 won. He uses both.”. Went with the GP100 and later got a trigger job. It would be hard to beat a S&W’s action, but at the end of the day it would be the Ruger for me. I don't regret my GP100 one bit. Be sure to enter the NES/MFS November Giveaway ***Chinese Surplus SKS Type 56***. It's trigger is superior, no matter how much you work on that GP100 it will never match the smoothness of a Smith.

Family Feud Questions For Youth Pdf, Split Screen Racing, Feel Invincible Nightcore 1 Hour, Fortnite Reading Comprehension Answers, Doug Lawler Wife, Whirlpool 18mstfa Too Cold,

view(s) 0

Auteur/Author:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.